No per-CI licensing. No surprise infrastructure charges. No six-month implementation before you see anything useful. Every tier includes a 90-day delivery commitment.
Trusted CMDB, health visibility, AI reasoning.
Partners launching a CMDB practice. Enterprise teams replacing ad-hoc discovery.
Everything in Foundation plus service maps and asset lifecycle.
Operations teams that need to understand service dependencies and manage hardware/software inventory.
Everything in Standard plus incident intelligence and architecture tooling.
Mature IT orgs running a live CMDB who need AI-powered incident RCA and solution design validation.
The full GPS platform with compliance, governance, and trust fabric.
Regulated environments. Audit-mandated organisations. Security-first enterprise IT.
FULL FEATURE COMPARISON
| CAPABILITY | FOUNDATION | STANDARD | PROFESSIONAL | ENTERPRISE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | ||||
| Agentless behavioral discovery (eBPF/ETW) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent-based deep CI profiling | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Closed-loop confidence scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zero-credential vault | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous environment refresh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ephemeral/container CI tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Health & Risk | ||||
| Multi-dimension health scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tech debt prioritisation reporting | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remediation cost modelling* Full modelling from Standard | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Service Mapping | ||||
| Auto-generated service dependency maps | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| BFS blast radius analysis | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Temporal relationship tracking | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Change impact simulation | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Asset Lifecycle | ||||
| Hardware asset lifecycle management | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Software license compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| End-of-life / end-of-support tracking | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Incident Intelligence | ||||
| Competing hypotheses RCA | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Falsifier-validated root cause | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| P1 stakeholder assembly | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| SLA breach prediction | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Architecture | ||||
| CSDM model compliance validation | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tech debt roadmap generation | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI & Intelligence | ||||
| Falsifier-mandatory AI assertions | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Confidence bands with assumed facts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 6-persona executive intelligence | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI-narrated CI merge decisions | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Compliance & Trust | ||||
| Bitemporal data fabric | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hash-chained immutable audit trail | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 19 compliance framework support | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Automated evidence collection | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Regulatory audit reporting | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Delivery | ||||
| 90-day first living CMDB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native ServiceNow CMDB population | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated implementation partner | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
COMPETITIVE CONTEXT
To assemble equivalent capability using ServiceNow licensing and Professional Services, this is what each tier maps to — and where the gaps remain regardless of spend.
3-YEAR TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP — ENTERPRISE EQUIVALENT
Reference: 2,000 SUs · 100 Business Apps · 10 operators · 56% discount from ServiceNow list pricing
◆ DC & Network Asset Management pricing estimated at $40/mo/SU list ($17.60 after 56% disc.) — not yet GA. BCM Adv ($211.20/mo/operator), IHUB Enterprise, and DC&NAM excluded from 3-yr total above. All SN rates 56% below list. Actual costs vary by negotiated terms and environment scope. Capability gaps listed above remain regardless of SN spend level.
COMMON QUESTIONS
No. Avennorth is sold as a fixed engagement per tier. There are no surprise charges based on how many CIs are discovered, how many nodes the platform scans, or how many services Contour maps. The engagement price covers the scope defined at kickoff.
The first trusted CMDB is delivered in 90 days. Weeks 1–3 cover foundation setup and ServiceNow connector configuration. Weeks 4–10 cover active agent discovery and CI population. Weeks 11–13 are CMDB validation and handover to continuous operation. See the Implementation page for the full timeline.
No. Avennorth writes directly into your existing ServiceNow CMDB. We are not a replacement for ServiceNow — we are what makes your ServiceNow investment trustworthy. Pathfinder populates your CMDB, Bearing scores it, Contour maps it, Vantage reasons about incidents using it.
Yes. All tiers run on the same platform. Upgrading to Standard or Professional adds modules to an already-operational platform — there is no re-implementation, no data migration, and no discovery restart required.
Most CMDB projects fail because discovery runs once, produces a snapshot that becomes stale, and nobody trusts the data within six months. Pathfinder runs continuously. Bearing flags degradation in real time. Contour keeps the service map current. The CMDB stays trusted because the platform never stops working.
Trust extends the platform's audit chain for regulatory and compliance use cases: 19 pre-built compliance framework mappings (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, NIST, PCI-DSS and more), automated evidence collection from the discovery fabric, and audit reporting with hash-chained record verification.
Book a scoping call. We will map your current environment to the right tier and show you a delivery timeline with specific milestones.